Skip to main content

LGBTQ+

Click the poster to learn more about LGBT History Month and the Equality Forum.

Databases

Daily Icon

The Flags

The Rainbow Pride Flag

Originally designed by artist Gilbert Baker in 1978, the traditional and still most common variant of this flag consists of six stripes: Red ('Life"), orange ("Healing"), yellow ("Sunlight"), green ("Nature"), blue ("Harmony"), and violet ("Spirit").

The Lesbian Pride Flag

No single flag design for a lesbian pride flag has been widely adopted.  However, in 2018, this five striped version picked up traction.  Dark orange represents 'gender non-conformity', light orange for 'community', white for 'unique relationships to womanhood', pink for 'serenity and peace', and dark rose for 'femininity'.

The Bisexual Pride Flag

This flag was designed by Michael Page in 1998 to increase the visibility of the bisexual community. Pink is for same-sex/gender attraction, blue is for different sex/gender attraction, and purple is to represent the attraction across the gender spectrum.

The Transgender Pride Flag

The Transgender Pride Flag was created by American trans woman Monica Helms in 1999.  The light blue represents the traditional color for baby boys, and the pink is the traditional color for baby girls. The white stripe is for those who are transitioning or consider themselves having a neutral or undefined gender.

The Pansexual Pride Flag

The pansexual pride flag was introduced in October 2010. The pink stripe represents attraction to women, the blue attraction to men, and the yellow for being attracted to everyone else (i.e, non-binary gender, agender, bigender, or genderfluid).

The Asexual Pride Flag

This flag was created in 2010 as part of a community effort. The black stripe represents asexuality; the gray stripe represents gray-asexuals and demisexuals; the white stripe represents allies, and the purple stripe represents community.

The Nonbinary Pride Flag

The non-binary flag was created in 2014 by activist Kye Rowan. Yellow represents people who identify outside of the gender binary, white for nonbinary people with multiple genders, purple for those with a mixture of both male and female genders, and black for agender individuals.

The Aromantic Pride Flag

The stripes represent aromanticism (green), the aromantic spectrum (light green), aesthetic attraction (white), gray-aromantic and demiromantic people (gray), and the sexuality spectrum (black).

The Intersex Pride Flag

The intersex flag was created by Morgan Carpenter of Intersex Human Rights Australia in July 2013. The organization describes the circle as "unbroken and unornamented, symbolizing wholeness and completeness, and our potentialities."

The Progress Pride Flag

Created by Daniel Quasar in 2018, this flag takes the traditional rainbow colors, and adds the white, pink, and light blue to reflect the colors of the transgender flag, while the brown and black stripes represent people of color and those lost to AIDS.

Learn About...

THE SOCIETY FOR HUMAN RIGHTS

Founded by Henry Gerber in 1924, the Society for Human Rights was the first recognized gay rights organization in the United States. However, after only a few months, several of the Society's members were arrested on "obscenity" charges, and the group disbanded. 


THE MATTACHINE SOCIETY

Founded in 1950, the Mattachine Society was one of the next earliest gay rights organizations in the United States. The Society existed as a single national organization headquartered first in Los Angeles and then, beginning around 1956, in other locales across the country. During the 1960s, the various unaffiliated Mattachine Societies were among the foremost gay rights groups in the United States. However, beginning in the middle 1960s and, especially, following the Stonewall riots of 1969, they began increasingly to be seen as too traditional and lost momentum.


THE DAUGHTERS OF BILITIS

The first lesbian civil and political rights organization in the United States, The Daughters of Bilitis, formed in San Francisco in 1955 as a social alternative to lesbian bars, which were subject to raids and police harassment. As the DOB gained members, their focus shifted to supporting women who were afraid to come out. The DOB educated them about their rights and gay history. The group continued for 14 years as an educational resource for lesbians, gay men, researchers, and mental health professionals.

*Resources: Time, GLBTQ Archive, The Legacy Project: Chicago, and Wikipedia

THE PINK TRIANGLE

Under Paragraph 175 of the criminal code, male homosexuality was illegal in Germany, but it was rarely enforced until the Nazi Party took power in 1933. At that point, the Nazis persecuted homosexuals as part of their so-called 'moral crusade' to racially and culturally purify Germany. Gay men, in particular, were subject to harassment, arrest, incarceration, and even castration. The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum  estimates 100,000 gay men were arrested, and between 5,000 and 15,000 were placed in concentration camps.

Just as Jews were forced to identify themselves with yellow stars, gay men in concentration camps had to wear a large pink triangle.

An estimated 65 percent of gay men in concentration camps died between 1933 and 1945. Even after World War II, both East and West Germany upheld the country’s anti-gay law, and many gays remained incarcerated until the early 1970s. (The law was not officially repealed until 1994.)

In 1973, post-war Germany’s first gay rights organization, Homosexuelle Aktion Westberlin (HAW), reclaimed the pink triangle as a symbol of liberation.  The triangle was used again in 1987 by the Silence=Death Project to raise AIDS awareness.

*Resources: The United States Holocaust Museum, the Contemporary Jewish Museum, and History.com

THE LAVENDER SCARE

During the 1950s, the U.S. State Department worked to root out “immoral,” “scandalous,” and “dangerous” employees—people whose personal conduct put the entire nation at risk. While this began as a search for Communists (the Red Scare), LGBT people were soon included. Condemned as “perverts” and bullied out of their jobs, an unknown number of LGBT employees, likely in the thousands, were driven out of their jobs between the 1940s and 1960s. This time has become known as the Lavender Scare. (The term "lavender lads", used repeatedly by Senator Everett Dirksen as a synonym for homosexual males).

Historian David K. Johnson explains that “The official rationale wasn’t that homosexuals were Communists, but that they could be used by Communists [...] A variation on the blackmail rationale…held that Communists promoted “sex perversion” among American youth as a way to weaken the country and clear the path for a Communist takeover.”

The scare lasted until the 1960s when investigations slowed. Only in the 1970s was the ban on gay intelligence community members relaxed, and it took until 1995 for another executive order, signed by President Bill Clinton, to explicitly state that the government may not discriminate based on sexual orientation when it comes to granting access to classified information.

*Resources: The National Archives and History.com

THE STONEWALL UPRISING

In the 1960s, homosexuality was still illegal in most states.  Several laws prohibited same-sex public displays of affection, and a criminal statute in New York forbade people from wearing less than three “gender appropriate” articles of clothing. Officials frequently withheld liquor licenses from gay-friendly bars, making the bars prime targets for police raids, which were constant.  This was true of the Stonewall Inn, which was operated by the notorious Genovese mafia family.  It was not unusual for gay-friendly bars and clubs to be run by mafia members; typically, these bars would be tipped off by police about an impending raid so they could hide the liquor and pay off the authorities.  However, there was no warning on June 28th, 1969.

In the early hours of that morning, police raided the Stonewall Inn, arresting 13 people.  However, unlike other raids, the crowd fought back against the police.  Fed up with the harassment and persecution, patrons and those living in the neighborhood began throwing bottles, rocks, and even loose change at the police.  The pushback grew to the point that police barricaded themselves inside the bar until backup could arrive.

There were further riots the following night, with more anger and violence on both sides.  Two days later, The Village Voice published two articles about the riots, using homophobic slurs.  This prompted another uprising, this time outside the paper's office, which was down the street from the Stonewall Inn.

The uprisings galvanized members of the LGBTQ community to come together and work toward progress.  One year later, on June 28, 1970, thousands of people marched in the streets from the Stonewall Inn to Central Park, marking America’s first gay pride parade.  In 2016, President Barack Obama named the Stonewall Inn a National Historic Landmark under the care of the National Park Service.

Read this firsthand account of the uprising from Dick Leitsch.

Resources: Mental FlossThe Atlantic; History.com

THE HIV/AIDS EPIDEMIC

The full history of the HIV-AIDS crisis is too extensive and overwhelming to attempt to cover in this small box.  Included instead is a brief snapshot and links to further information and resources that more fully encapsulate the scope and devastation caused by the epidemic.

In mid-1981, reports of a new cancer that appeared to be rapidly killing gay men were published by the U.S. Center for Disease Control (CDC) and in the New York Times.  In 1982, the CDC identified the illness as “AIDS” (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome) for the first time, and the Gay Men's Health Crisis was founded in NYC, providing information and counseling hotlines.  It would take The New York Times almost two years before it gave AIDS front-page space on May 25, 1983. By 1984, more than 3,500 people had died from AIDS-related complications.

However, AIDS was not publicly acknowledged by the U.S. government until 1985 - four years after the crisis began - when President Ronald Reagan finally announced that it was a "top priority."  Since the beginning of the epidemic, nearly 675,000 people with AIDS in the United States have died, and even today, approximately 13,000 people with AIDS in the United States die each year.


Resources: CDC; HIV.gov; AvertHistory.com

One, Inc. v. Olesen (1958)

In 1953, the Mattachine Society released ONE: The Homosexual Magazine, America’s first widely-distributed magazine for gay readers, which included articles, editorials, and short stories. Not long after publication began, postal authorities seized the magazines arguing that the publication violated obscenity laws.  In its decision, the Supreme Court established that material aimed at a gay audience was not inherently obscene. The decision validated that people had the right to publish LGBTQ media.

Baker v. Nelson (1972)

The Supreme Court considered the issue of marriage equality for the first time in 1972. A young Minneapolis couple, Richard John Baker and James Michael McConnell sparked the case when they wanted to get married. However, the Supreme Court dismissed the case “for want of a substantial federal question.”  Ultimately, the couple got married anyway by obtaining a marriage license in a different Minnesota county in 1971. Baker changed his name to Pat Lyn McConnell to obtain the certificate. A Minnesota judge ruled that the couple’s marriage is valid in 2018.

Romer v. Evans (1996)

In this decision, the Supreme Court ruled that laws couldn’t single out LGBTQ people to take away their rights.  The case revolved around an amendment to a Colorado law, which banned cities from passing anti-discrimination laws that would protect gay and bisexual people. In a 6-3 decision, the Court ruled that the law didn’t adhere to the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause, because it singled out and discriminated against a specific group. 

Lawrence v. Texas (2003)

The Court ultimately eliminated remaining sodomy laws (which made same-sex relations illegal) in 2003, overruling Bowers v. Hardwick with a vote of 6-3. Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion, saying that the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment gave the petitioners “the full right to engage in private conduct without government intervention…”  Karen Loewy, senior counsel Lambda Legal, which fights for LGBTQ legal rights notes that her organization helped to popularize the idea that “public ideas about morality cannot justify infringing people’s constitutional rights.” 

United States v. Windsor (2013)

This case was one of the major precursors to marriage equality. The Court decided to eliminate the portion of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) of 1996 that defined marriage as a “legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife.” The case considered the situation of Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer, who were married in Canada before moving to New York, a state that recognized their marriage. After Spyer passed away, Windsor’s attempted to claim a tax exemption for surviving spouses — only to be blocked by DOMA. In a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court ruled that DOMA violates due process and equal protection principles, and ordered the United States to refund Windsor’s taxes.

Obergefell v Hodges (2015)

A group of 14 same-sex couples and two men whose partners were deceased joined together and won one of the LGBTQ rights movement’s biggest victories: marriage.  In a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court found for the petitioners, who argued that state officials violated the 14th amendment’s equal protection clause by prohibiting them from marrying or not recognizing marriages performed in other states.  The court also extended the benefits guaranteed to opposite-sex married couples. 

Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018)

Although by 2018 LGBTQ people could marry, the Supreme Court found that a baker was not required to make wedding cakes for same-sex marriages.  In a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court found for Colorado baker Jack Phillips, who had refused to make a gay couple a wedding cake on religious grounds. Phillips argued that baking cakes requires his “artistic skills” and being forced to bake the cake would have infringed upon his freedom of speech and his rights to practice his religion. However, the Court’s argument in favor of Phillips hinged upon the state’s “impermissible hostility toward his sincere religious beliefs,” noting that a commissioner compared Phillips’ religious beliefs to defending slavery or the Holocaust.

*Resources: Time; Wikipedia